<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Art of Software &#187; Great Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orionseven.com/blog/category/great-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orionseven.com/blog</link>
	<description>It takes a lot more than code to make software.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Great Article: A Little Less Conversation</title>
		<link>http://orionseven.com/blog/2010/01/23/great-article-a-little-less-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://orionseven.com/blog/2010/01/23/great-article-a-little-less-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Great Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orionseven.com/blog/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only magazine I subscribe to is Inc. Magazine. I&#8217;ve been subscribing to it for a bit over two years and for the measly $10 a year I pay I feel I get many returns on my investment. And no, I&#8217;m not being paid to post this. In the last issue Joel Spolsky had an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only magazine I subscribe to is <a href="http://www.inc.com/">Inc. Magazine</a>. I&#8217;ve been subscribing to it for a bit over two years and for the measly $10 a year I pay I feel I get many returns on my investment. And no, I&#8217;m not being paid to post this.</p>
<p>In the last issue <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com">Joel Spolsky</a> had an article called &#8220;<a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/20100201/a-little-less-conversation.html">A Little Less Conversation</a>&#8220;. It&#8217;s up now on Inc&#8217;s site and I suggest everyone to read it. I enjoyed it so much I brought it to work to share. I was a bit nervous to do this, because I know I have the ability to side rail a meeting with a joke in no time flat. However, the article is good and really highlights something I think we all know, that the more people you have in a meeting (or keep connected) the less effective it is and shows how it can really slow things down.</p>
<blockquote><p>But communications costs add up faster than you think, especially on larger teams. What used to work with three people in a garage all talking to one another about everything just doesn&#8217;t work when your head count reaches 10 or 20 people. Everybody who doesn&#8217;t need to be in that meeting is killing productivity. Everybody who doesn&#8217;t need to read that e-mail is distracted by it. <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>At some point, overcommunicating just isn&#8217;t efficient.</strong></em></span></p>
<p>(emphasis is mine)</p></blockquote>
<p>Anyhow, I hope everyone reads it and looks at their own teams. The information may be obvious, and I&#8217;m sure many either have inherently felt this at work or already knew this information. But it&#8217;s good to look around as your team grows and keep this in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orionseven.com/blog/2010/01/23/great-article-a-little-less-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

